UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink Research Articles

Prognostic factors for colchicine prophylaxis-related adverse events when initiating allopurinol for gout: retrospective cohort study.

Colchicine is commonly used to prevent flares when starting urate-lowering therapy for gout. Patients with gout are frequently concurrently prescribed other medications (such as statins) that may interact with colchicine, increasing the risk of adverse events. The aim of this study was to describe potential prognostic factors for adverse events in patients prescribed colchicine when initiating allopurinol. We conducted a retrospective cohort study in linked UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink and Hospital Episode Statistics datasets. Adults initiating allopurinol for gout with colchicine (01/04/1997-30/11/2016) were included. Potential prognostic factors were defined, and the likelihood of adverse events, including diarrhoea, nausea or vomiting, myocardial infarction (MI), neuropathy, myalgia, myopathy, rhabdomyolysis, and bone marrow suppression, were estimated. From 01/04/1997-30/11/2016, 13 945 people with gout initiated allopurinol with colchicine prophylaxis (mean age 63.9 (SD 14.7) years, 78.2% male). One quarter (26%, 95% CI 25% to 27%) were prescribed ≥1 potentially interacting medicines, most commonly statins (21%, 95% CI 20% to 22%). Statins were not associated with increased adverse events, although other drugs were associated with some adverse outcomes. Diarrhoea and MI were associated with more comorbidities and more severe CKD. People were given colchicine prophylaxis despite commonly having preexisting prescriptions for medications with potential to interact with colchicine. Adverse events were more common in people who had more comorbidities and certain potentially interacting medications. Our findings will provide much-needed information about prognostic factors for colchicine-related adverse events that can inform treatment decisions about prophylaxis when initiating allopurinol.

Evaluating the comparability of osteoporosis treatments using propensity score and negative control outcome methods in UK and Denmark electronic health record databases.

Evidence on the comparative effectiveness of osteoporosis treatments is heterogeneous. This may be attributed to different populations and clinical practice, but also to differing methodologies ensuring comparability of treatment groups before treatment effect estimation and the amount of residual confounding by indication. This study assessed the comparability of denosumab vs oral bisphosphonate (OBP) groups using propensity score (PS) methods and negative control outcome (NCO) analysis. A total of 280 288 women aged ≥50years initiating denosumab or OBP in 2011-2018 were included from the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) and the Danish National Registries (DNR). Balance of observed covariates was assessed using absolute standardised mean difference (ASMD) before and after PS weighting, matching, and stratification, with ASMD >0.1 indicating imbalance. Residual confounding was assessed using NCOs with ≥100 events. Hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) between treatment and NCO was estimated using Cox models. Presence of residual confounding was evaluated with two approaches1: >5% of NCOs with 95% CI excluding 1,2 >5% of NCOs with an upper CI <0.75 or lower CI >1.3. The number of imbalanced covariates before adjustment (CPRD 22/87; DNR 18/83) decreased, with 2-11% imbalance remaining after weighting, matching or stratification. Using approach 1, residual confounding was present for all PS methods in both databases (≥8% of NCOs), except for stratification in DNR (3.8%). Using approach 2, residual confounding was present in CPRD with PS matching (5.3%) and stratification (6.4%), but not with weighting (4.3%). Within DNR, no NCOs had HR estimates with upper or lower CI limits beyond the specified bounds indicating residual confounding for any PS method. Achievement of covariate balance and determination of residual bias were dependent upon several factors including the population under study, PS method, prevalence of NCO, and the threshold indicating residual confounding.

Weight Management with Orlistat in Type 2 Diabetes - An Electronic Healthcare Records Study.

Orlistat is recommended as an adjunct to diet and exercise for weight loss in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The aims were to explore (i) associations between patient characteristics and orlistat prescribing and to determine (ii) associations of orlistat with weight loss in T2DM/prediabetes. This cohort study used anonymised records of T2DM/prediabetes (2016-2017) patients ≥18 years, from the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) database. Multivariable logistic regression models determined associations with starting orlistat and stopping it early (<12 weeks of prescriptions) and orlistat's associations with weight loss in those not prescribed 2nd line anti-diabetic medications. Out of 100,552 patients with incident T2DM/prediabetes, 655 (0.8%) T2DM and 128 (0.7%) prediabetes patients were prescribed orlistat. Younger people, females, those in more deprived regions, current smokers, co-prescribed metformin and recorded with hypertension were significantly more likely to be prescribed orlistat while higher baseline HbA1c levels were associated with early stopping. Those who continued orlistat for >12 weeks were more likely to lose ≥5% weight (adjusted OR: 1.69; 95% CI: 1.07, 2.67) than those not on orlistat, but those who stopped orlistat early were less likely (adjusted OR: 0.56; 95% CI: 0.29, 1.09). Orlistat was significantly associated with weight loss in T2DM/prediabetes when taken for at least 12 weeks. However, orlistat is infrequently prescribed and often taken for <12 weeks. Orlistat may be a useful adjunct to lifestyle modifications in T2DM/prediabetes however barriers to continuing orlistat means it may not be effective for everyone in managing weight loss.

Risk of adverse outcomes during gabapentinoid therapy and factors associated with increased risk in UK primary care using the clinical practice research datalink: a cohort study.

Growing evidence from pharmacovigilance data and postmortem toxicology reports highlights the misuse potential of gabapentinoids. This study aimed to investigate the risk of serious adverse outcomes (drug misuse, overdose, major trauma), and their risk factors, in primary care patients who are prescribed gabapentinoids. Using the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink, a matched cohort study calculated adverse event rates separately for gabapentinoid-exposed and unexposed cohorts. In the exposed cohort, event rates for exposure to a range of potential risk factors were calculated. Event rates were compared using Cox proportional hazards models, adjusted for age, sex, deprivation, previous mental health diagnosis, and coprescribing with potentially interacting medicines. Substance misuse (gabapentin adjusted hazard ratio [95% CI]: 2.40 [2.25-2.55]), overdose (2.99 [2.56-3.49]), and major trauma (0-2.5 years: 1.35 [1.28-1.42]; 2.5 to 10 years: 1.73 [1.56-1.95]) were more common among patients prescribed gabapentinoids than matched individuals who were not. The association with overdose was stronger for pregabalin than gabapentin. All adverse outcomes were significantly associated with smoking, history of substance misuse, overdose, or a mental health condition and prescription of opioids, benzodiazepines, antidepressants, and Z-drug hypnotics (eg, gabapentin hazard ratios for association of concurrent opioid use: misuse 1.49 [1.47-1.51]; overdose 1.87 [1.78-1.96]; major trauma 1.28 [1.26-1.30]). Our findings highlight the importance of careful patient selection when prescribing gabapentinoids and the need to educate prescribers about the risks of these drugs, particularly in combination with other central nervous system depressants.

Comparison of Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Active Cancer Receiving Rivaroxaban or Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin: The OSCAR-UK Study.

In most patients with cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (CT), essentially those not at high risk of bleeding, guidelines recommend treatment with direct oral anticoagulants as an alternative to low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs). Population-based studies comparing these therapies are scarce. To compare the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) recurrences, significant bleeding, and all-cause mortality in patients with CT receiving rivaroxaban or LMWHs. Using UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink data from 2013 to 2020, we generated a cohort of patients with first CT treated initially with either rivaroxaban or LMWH. Patients were observed 12 months for VTE recurrences, significant bleeds (major bleeds or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding requiring hospitalization), and all-cause mortality. Overlap weighted sub-distribution hazard ratios (SHRs) compared rivaroxaban with LMWH in an intention-to-treat analysis. The cohort consisted of 2,259 patients with first CT, 314 receiving rivaroxaban, and 1,945 LMWH, mean age 72.4 and 66.9 years, respectively. In the 12-month observational period, 184 person-years following rivaroxaban and 1,057 following LMWH, 10 and 66 incident recurrent VTE events, 20 and 102 significant bleeds, and 10 and 133 deaths were observed in rivaroxaban and LMWH users, respectively. The weighted SHR at 12 months for VTE recurrences in rivaroxaban compared with LMWH were 0.80 (0.37-1.73); for significant bleeds 1.01 (0.57-1.81); and for all-cause mortality 0.49 (0.23-1.06). Patients with CT, not at high risk of bleeding, treated with either rivaroxaban or LMWH have comparable effectiveness and safety outcomes. This supports the recommendation that rivaroxaban is a reasonable alternative to LMWH for the treatment of CT.

Use of 5-alpha reductase inhibitors and risk of gastrointestinal cancers in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia: A population-based cohort study.

Pre-clinical evidence suggests that 5-alpha reductase inhibitors (5ARi's), prescribed in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia, reduce colorectal and gastro-oesophageal cancer incidence via action on the male hormonal pathway. However, few studies to date have investigated this association at the population level. Our study aimed to investigate the risk of colorectal and gastro-oesophageal cancers with the use of 5ARi's. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of new users of 5ARi's and alpha-blockers among patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia in the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink. Patients were followed until a first ever diagnosis of colorectal or gastro-oesophageal cancer, death from any cause or end of registration with the general practice or 31st of December 2017. Cox proportional hazards models with inverse probability of treatment weights were used to calculate weighted hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of incident colorectal cancer or gastro-oesophageal cancer associated with the use of 5ARi's compared to alpha-blockers. During a mean follow-up of 6.6 years, we found no association between the use of 5ARi's and colorectal (HR: 1.13, 95% CI 0.91-1.41) or gastro-oesophageal (HR 1.14, 95% CI 0.76-1.63) cancer risk compared to alpha-blockers. Sensitivity analysis showed largely consistent results when varying lag periods, using multiple imputations, and accounting for competing risk of death. Our study found no association between the use of 5ARi's and risk of colorectal or gastro-oesophageal cancer in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Burden of Disease and Treatment Patterns Amongst Patients With Vitiligo: Findings From a National, Longitudinal Retrospective Study in the United Kingdom.

This retrospective study, using UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink and Hospital Episode Statistics databases, analysed 17,239 incident patients with vitiligo. Mean incidence of vitiligo was 0.16 (2010-2021) per 1000 person-years (range: 0.10 [2010-COVID] to 0.19 [2013/2018]); prevalence increased from 0.21% (2010) to 0.38% (2021). The most common comorbidities recorded after vitiligo diagnosis were diabetes (19.4%), eczema (8.9%), thyroid disease (7.5%), and rheumatoid arthritis (6.9%). Mental health diagnoses recorded at any time were most commonly depression and/or anxiety (24.6%), depression (18.5%), anxiety (16.0%), and sleep disturbance (12.7%); recorded after vitiligo diagnosis in 6.4%, 4.4%, 5.5%, and 3.9%, respectively. Mental health comorbidities were more common among White patients (eg, depression and/or anxiety, 29.0%) than Black (18.8%), Asian (16.1%), and other ethnicities (21.4%). In adolescents, depression and/or anxiety was most commonly diagnosed after vitiligo diagnosis (7.4% vs before, 1.8%). Healthcare resources were used most frequently in the first year after vitiligo diagnosis (incident cohort), typically dermatology-related outpatient appointments (101.9/100 person-years) and general practitioner consultations (97.9/100 person-years). In the year after diagnosis, 60.8% of incident patients did not receive vitiligo-related treatments (ie, topical corticosteroids, topical calcineurin inhibitors, oral corticosteroids, phototherapy), increasing to 82.0% the next year; median (95% CI) time from diagnosis to first treatment was 34.0 (31.6-36.4) months. Antidepressants and/or anxiolytics were recorded for 16.7% of incident patients in the year after diagnosis. In 2019, 85.0% of prevalent patients did not receive vitiligo-related treatments; 16.6% had a record of antidepressant and/or anxiolytic treatments. Most patients were not on vitiligo-related treatments within a year of diagnosis, with time to first treatment >2 years, suggesting that vitiligo may be dismissed as unimportant and not treated early, in part due to limited effectiveness of available treatments. New effective treatments, early initiation, and psychological intervention and support are needed to reduce vitiligo burden on patients.

Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors and the risk of atrial fibrillation in patients with type 2 diabetes: a population-based cohort study.

Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2is) have a direct cardiac effect that is likely to be independent of its glucose lowering renal effect. Previous research has shown that SGLT2-is mitigate heart failure and prevent arrhythmic cardiac death. Our objective is to determine whether SGLT-2is reduce atrial fibrillation (AF) in comparison to other second-to third-line antidiabetic drugs in type 2 diabetes. We conducted a population-based, new-user active comparator cohort study using data from the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink. We identified a cohort of patients initiating a new antidiabetic drug class between January 2013 and September 2020. This cohort included patients initiating their first ever non-insulin antidiabetic drug, as well as those who switched to or added-on an antidiabetic drug class not previously used in their treatment history. Individuals with a diagnosis of AF or atrial flutter at any time before cohort entry were excluded. Cox regression analysis with time-dependent covariates was used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95%-CIs) of AF comparing SGLT-2-is with other second-to third-line antidiabetic drugs. Stratified analyses were performed according to sex, diabetes duration (<5 or ≥5 years), body mass index (BMI), HbA1c, and presence of heart failure. The cohort comprised 142,447 patients. SGLT-2is were associated with a statistically significant reduced hazard of AF compared to other second-to third-line antidiabetic drugs (adjusted HR:0.77[95%-CI:0.68-0.88]). This reduced risk was present in both sexes but was more prominently among women (adjusted HRwomen:0.60[95%-CI:0.45-0.79]; HRmen:0.85[95%-CI:0.73-0.98]; P-value interaction:0.012). There was no evidence for effect modification when stratifying on duration of diabetes, body mass index, HbA1c, or presence of heart failure. SGLT-2is were associated with a reduced risk of AF in patients with type 2 diabetes compared to other second-to third-line antidiabetic drugs. This reduced risk occurs in both sexes but more prominently among women.

Prevalence of comorbidities with the potential to increase the risk of nonadherence to topical ocular hypotensive medication in patients with open-angle glaucoma

Objective To evaluate the prevalence of comorbidities that may limit or prevent adherence to topical ocular hypotensive therapy in patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG). Methods The UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) database of primary and secondary care and prescription records was analyzed to identify patients with a first (index) diagnosis of OAG during 2016–2020. The primary care records of these patients were screened for diagnostic terms linked to prespecified (qualifying) comorbidities considered to have the potential to impact patients’ ability to instill eye drops. The prevalence of each of 10 categories of qualifying comorbidity recorded within the period from 5 years before to 2 years after the index OAG diagnosis was analyzed. Results A total of 100,968 patients with OAG were included in the analysis. Among the patients in the OAG cohort, 13,962 (13.8%) were aged 40–54 years, 32,145 (31.8%) were aged 55–69 years, 42,042 (41.6%) were aged 70–84 years, and 12,819 (12.7%) were aged 85+ years. Within the OAG population, 82.7%, 14.6%, and 2.7% of patients had no category, one category, and two or more categories of qualifying comorbidity, respectively. Qualifying comorbidities were most common in older patients. The most prevalent qualifying comorbidities were categorized as degenerative, traumatic, or pathological central nervous system disorder disrupting cognitive function (5.2%), movement disorder (4.4%), and low vision (4.1%). The prevalence of arthropathies and injuries affecting upper limbs (including arthritis in the hands) was 2.4%. Conclusions The presence of comorbidities should be considered when determining whether eye drops are suitable treatment for glaucoma. Neurodegenerative disease affecting cognition and memory, motor disease, and low vision are common comorbidities that may impact adherence to eye drops, and affected patients may benefit from non-drop treatment modalities.

Ethnic differences in depression and anxiety among adults with atopic eczema: Population-based matched cohort studies within UK primary care.

Evidence demonstrates that individuals with atopic eczema (eczema) have increased depression and anxiety; however, the role of ethnicity in these associations is poorly understood. We aimed to investigate whether associations between eczema and depression or anxiety differed between adults from white and minority ethnic groups in the UK. We used UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink GOLD to conduct matched cohort studies of adults (≥18years) with ethnicity recorded in primary care electronic health records (April 2006-January 2020). We matched (age, sex, practice) adults with eczema to up to five adults without. We used stratified Cox regression with an interaction between eczema and ethnicity, to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) for associations between eczema and incident depression and anxiety in individuals from white ethnic groups and a pooled minority ethnic group (adults from Black, South Asian, Mixed and Other groups). We identified separate cohorts for depression (215,073 with eczema matched to 646,539 without) and anxiety (242,598 with eczema matched to 774,113 without). After adjusting for matching variables and potential confounders (age, sex, practice, deprivation, calendar period), we found strong evidence (p<0.01) of ethnic differences in associations between eczema and depression (minority ethnic groups: HR=1.33, 95% CI=1.22,1.45; white ethnic groups: HR=1.15, 95% CI=1.12,1.17) and anxiety (minority ethnic groups: HR=1.41, 95% CI=1.28,1.55; white ethnic groups: HR=1.17, 95% CI=1.14,1.19). Adults with eczema from minority ethnic groups appear to be at increased depression and anxiety risk compared with their white counterparts. Culturally adapted mental health promotion and prevention strategies should be considered in individuals with eczema from minority ethnic groups.

Risk of fractures in half a million survivors of 20 cancers: a population-based matched cohort study using linked English electronic health records

A history of multiple myeloma, prostate cancer, and breast cancer has been associated with adverse bone health, but associations across a broader range of cancers are unclear. We aimed to compare the risk of any bone fracture and major osteoporotic fractures in survivors of a wide range of cancers versus cancer-free individuals. In this population-based matched cohort study, we used electronic health records from the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink linked to hospital data. We included adults (aged ≥18 years) eligible for linkage, and we restricted the study start to Jan 2, 1998, onwards and applied administrative censoring on Jan 31, 2020. The cancer survivor group included survivors of the 20 most common cancers. Each individual with cancer was matched (age, sex, and general practice) to up to five controls (1:5) who were cancer-free. The primary outcomes were any bone fracture and any major osteoporotic fracture (pelvic, hip, wrist, spine, or proximal humeral fractures) occurring more than 1 year after index date (ie, the diagnosis date of the matched individual with cancer). We used Cox regression models, adjusted for shared risk factors, to estimate associations between cancer survivorship and bone fractures. 578 160 adults with cancer diagnosed in 1998-2020 were matched to 3 226 404 cancer-free individuals. Crude incidence rates of fractures in cancer survivors ranged between 8·39 cases (95% CI 7·45-9·46) per 1000 person-years for thyroid cancer and 21·62 cases (20·18-23·18) per 1000 person-years for multiple myeloma. Compared with cancer-free individuals, the risk of any bone fracture was increased in 15 of 20 cancers, and of major osteoporotic fractures in 17 of 20 cancers. Effect sizes varied: adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) were largest for multiple myeloma (1·94, 95% CI 1·77-2·13) and prostate cancer (1·43, 1·39-1·47); HRs in the range 1·20-1·50 were seen for stomach, liver, pancreas, lung, breast, kidney, and CNS cancers; smaller associations (HR <1·20) were observed for malignant melanoma, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, leukaemia, and oesophageal, colorectal, and cervical cancers. Increased risks of major osteoporotic fracture were noted most substantially in multiple myeloma (2·25, 1·96-2·58) and CNS (2·12, 1·56-2·87), liver (1·62, 1·01-2·61), prostate (1·60, 1·53-1·67), and lung cancers (1·60, 1·44-1·77). Effect sizes tended to reduce over time since diagnosis but remained elevated for more than 5 years in several cancers, such as multiple myeloma and stomach, lung, breast, prostate, and CNS cancers. Survivors of most types of cancer were at increased risk of bone fracture for several years after cancer, with variation by cancer type. These findings can help to inform mitigation and prevention strategies. Wellcome Trust.

Use of drugs for hyperlipidaemia and diabetes and risk of primary and secondary brain tumours: nested case–control studies using the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD)

ObjectivesPrevious studies have suggested that fibrates and glitazones may have a role in brain tumour prevention. We examined if there is support for these observations using primary care records from...

Population-Based Study of Alcohol-Related Liver Disease in England in 2001-2018: Influence of Socioeconomic Position.

England has seen an increase in deaths due to alcohol-related liver disease (ALD) since 2001. We studied the influence of socioeconomic position on the incidence of ALD and the mortality after ALD diagnosis in England in 2001-2018. This was an observational cohort study based on health records contained within the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink covering primary care, secondary care, cause of death registration, and deprivation of neighborhood areas in 18.8 million residents. We estimated incidence rate and incidence rate ratios of ALD and hazard ratios of mortality. ALD was diagnosed in 57,784 individuals with a median age of 54 years and of whom 43% had cirrhosis. The ALD incidence rate increased by 65% between 2001 and 2018 in England to reach 56.1 per 100,000 person-years in 2018. The ALD incidence was 3-fold higher in those from the most deprived quintile vs those from the least deprived quintile (incidence rate ratio 3.30, 95% confidence interval 3.21-3.38), with reducing inequality at older than at younger ages. For 55- to 74-year-olds, there was a notable increase in the incidence rate between 2001 and 2018, from 96.1 to 158 per 100,000 person-years in the most deprived quintile and from 32.5 to 70.0 in the least deprived quintile. After ALD diagnosis, the mortality risk was higher for patients from the most deprived quintile vs those from the least deprived quintile (hazard ratio 1.22, 95% confidence interval 1.18-1.27), and this ratio did not change during 2001-2018. The increasing ALD incidence in England is a greater burden on individuals of low economic position compared with that on those of high socioeconomic position. This finding highlights ALD as a contributor to inequality in health.

Using an expanded algorithm to estimate prevalence of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in U.S. and UK.

There is an increasing need to better understand the burden of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) using real-world data (RWD). However, identifying ALS cases using RWD presents several challenges due to the rarity of ALS and the differences in database coding systems. MarketScan claims, and the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) databases were searched for diagnosis codes of ALS or MND, the only drugs approved for treating ALS (riluzole and edaravone) and clinical visits with 12-month enrolment prior to 1 January 2011. The main algorithm required ≥ 1 ALS diagnosis code together with prescriptions or clinical visits. We expanded the existing algorithm to identify unspecific (possible) ALS group that had codes for motor neuron disease (MND) and the ALS drugs. The study period was from 1 January 2011 until 31 December 2020. We identified 16,246 patients with ≥ 1 ALS code in Marketscan (denominator n = 85,279,619), yet only 184 were found in the UK CPRD (denominator n = 21,318,589). Using the main algorithm 9,433 ALS patients were included in MarketScan, with a prevalence ranged between 4.5 per 100,000 in 2019 and 6.2 in 2015. In MarketScan, 3,658 (4.3 per 100,000) had ≥ 1 MND code and the ALS drug codes (possible cases). In CPRD, 47.9% of 2,785 patients with ≥ 1 MND code had a prescription for riluzole (6.3 per 100,000), regarded as possible ALS cases. The expanded algorithm enabled the identification of a large population with ALS, or possible ALS, and the estimation of ALS prevalence in MarketScan and CPRD.

Risk of abnormal uterine bleeding associated with high-affinity compared with low-affinity serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors

BackgroundConcerns have been raised about the potential association between selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs)/serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) and the risk of abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB), which may be influenced by the affinity of SSRIs/SNRIs for serotonin transporter. Thus, we assessed whether SSRIs/SNRIs with high-affinity for serotonin transporter are associated with AUB compared to SSRIs/SNRIs with low-affinity in non-pregnant women. MethodsUsing the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink, we identified a cohort of women aged 15–24 years, newly prescribed a high- or low-affinity SSRI/SNRI between 1990 and 2019. Confounding was addressed using standardized morbidity ratio weighting. We used weighted Cox proportional hazards models to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) and 95 % confidence interval (CI) of AUB associated with high-affinity compared with low-affinity SSRIs/SNRIs. We assessed the risk of anemia as a secondary outcome. ResultsThe cohort included 156,307 users of high-affinity SSRIs/SNRIs and 102,631 users of low-affinity SSRIs/SNRIs. High-affinity SSRIs/SNRIs were not associated with an increased risk of AUB compared with low-affinity SSRIs/SNRIs (incidence rates: 46.3 versus 42.4 per 1000 person-years, respectively; HR 1.01, 95 % CI 0.93–1.09). Duration of use, age, and comorbidities did not modify the risk. However, high-affinity SSRIs/SNRIs were associated with an increased risk of anemia (HR 1.29, 95 % CI 1.04–1.61) compared with low-affinity SSRIs/SNRIs. LimitationsResidual confounding may still be present. ConclusionsThe risk of AUB did not differ between high- and low-affinity SSRIs/SNRIs. However, the potential risk of anemia suggests the need for monitoring and further investigation of the risk of AUB with these medications.

Initiation patterns of anticoagulants for atrial fibrillation among older UK adults with and without chronic kidney disease, 2010–2020

BackgroundThere is a paucity of data on the initiation patterns of anticoagulants among older atrial fibrillation patients with and without chronic kidney disease (CKD).Setting and methodsWe used the UK Clinical...

NSAID prescribing and adverse outcomes in common infections: a population-based cohort study

ObjectivesInfections in primary care are often treated with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). This study evaluates whether NSAID prescribing is associated with adverse outcomes for respiratory (RTIs) or urinary track (UTI)...

Fracture patterns and associated risk factors in pediatric and early adulthood type 1 diabetes: Findings from a nationwide retrospective cohort study

PurposePeople with pediatric and early adulthood type 1 diabetes (T1D) might have a higher fracture risk at several sites compared to the general population. Therefore, we assessed the hazard ratios (HR) of various fracture sites and determined the risk factors associated with fractures among people with newly diagnosed childhood and adolescence T1D. MethodsAll people from the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink GOLD (1987–2017), below 20 years of age with a T1D diagnosis code (n = 3100) and a new insulin prescription, were included and matched 1:1 by sex, age, and practice to a control without diabetes. Cox regression was used to estimate HRs of any, major osteoporotic fractures (MOFs) and peripheral fractures (lower-arm and lower-legs) for people with T1D compared to controls. The analyses were adjusted for sex, age, diabetic complications, medication (glucocorticoids, anti-depressants, anxiolytics, bone medication, anti-convulsive), Charlson-comorbidity-index (CCI), hypoglycemia, falls and alcohol. T1D was further stratified by diabetes duration, presence of diabetic microvascular complications (retinopathy, nephropathy, and neuropathy) and boys versus girls. ResultsThe crude HRs for any fracture (HR: 1.30, CI95%: 1.11–1.51), lower-arm (HR: 1.22, CI95%: 1.00–1.48), and lower-leg fractures (HR: 1.54, CI95%: 1.11–2.13) were statistically significant increase in T1D compared to controls, but the effect disappeared in the adjusted analyses. For MOFs, no significant differences were seen. Risk factors in the T1D cohort were few, but the most predominantly one was a previous fracture (any fracture: HR: 2.00, CI95%: 1.70–2.36; MOFs: HR: 1.89, CI95%: 1.44–2.48, lower- arm fractures: HR: 2.08, CI95%: 1.53–2.82 and lower-leg fractures: HR: 2.08, CI95%: 1.34–3.25). Others were a previous fall (any fracture: HR: 1.54, CI95%: 1.20–1.97), hypoglycemia (Any fracture: HR: 1.46, CI95%: 1.21–1.77 and lower-leg fractures: HR: 2.34, CI95%: 1.47–3.75), and anxiolytic medication (Any fracture: HR: 1.52, CI95%: 1.10–2.11). Whereas girls had a lower risk compared to boys (Any fracture: HR: 0.78, CI95%: 0.67–0.90 and lower-arm fractures; HR: 0.51, CI95%: 0.38–0.68). The risk of any fracture in T1D did not increase with longer diabetes duration compared to controls (0–4 years: HR: 1.20, CI95%: 1.00–1.44; 5–9 years: HR: 1.17, CI95%: 0.91–1.50; <10 years: HR: 0.83, CI95%: 0.54–1.27). Similar patterns were observed for other fracture sites. Furthermore, one complication compared to none in T1D correlated with a higher fracture risk (1 complication: HR: 1.42, CI95%: 1.04–1.95). ConclusionThe overall fracture risk was not increased in pediatric and early adulthood T1D; instead, it was associated with familiar risk factors and specific diabetes-related ones.

Prognostic utility of Fibrosis-4 Index for risk of subsequent liver and cardiovascular events, and all-cause mortality in individuals with obesity and/or type 2 diabetes: a longitudinal cohort study

The Fibrosis-4 Index (FIB-4) is used as a non-invasive tool for the presence of advanced liver fibrosis in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease and type 2 diabetes. However, evidence for an association between FIB-4 and risk of mortality and/or liver-related clinical outcomes is limited. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between FIB-4 and subsequent liver events, cardiovascular events, and all-cause mortality in individuals with obesity and/or type 2 diabetes examined in routine general practice. This was a longitudinal cohort study in which eligible adults had obesity and/or type 2 diabetes and ≥1 FIB-4 score calculable from UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink GOLD after 1 January 2001. No alcohol-related disorders and/or chronic liver diseases (except non-alcoholic fatty liver disease) and/or no prescriptions of drugs inducing liver disease were permitted. Individuals were followed until time of first event, 10 years, or 1 January 2020. Analyses were conducted using Aalen-Johansen cumulative incidence functions and Cox proportional hazards models. Among 44,481 included individuals (mean age 58·8 years; 54% female), there were 979 liver, 6002 cardiovascular,and 8971 mortality events during the 10 years of follow-up. At 10 years, the cumulative incidence of liver events in the high (>2·67), indeterminate (1·30-2·67), and low (<1·30) baseline FIB-4 risk groups were 15%, 3%, and 1%, respectively. Age- and sex-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for liver events were elevated in high (16·46; 95%confidence interval [CI] 13·65-19·85) and indeterminate (2·45; 95% CI 2·07-2·90) versus low FIB-4 risk groups. Similar results were found for cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality. Among 20,433 individuals with ≥2 FIB-4 measurements, increase/decrease in FIB-4 12 months after baseline was directly associated with risk of liver events: compared with individuals with low baseline FIB-4 and no change in FIB-4 (reference), the adjusted HR (95% CI) for those with high baseline FIB-4 was 24·27 (16·98-34·68) with a one-unit FIB-4 increase, and 10·90 (7·90-15·05) with a one-unit decrease. In addition to its value as a diagnostic tool, FIB-4 has clinical utility as a prognostic biomarker. Sequential measurement provides a pragmatic, tractable monitoring biomarker that refines risk assessment for liver events, cardiovascular events, and mortality. Novo Nordisk A/S.

Phenotypes and rates of cancer-relevant symptoms and tests in the year before cancer diagnosis in UK Biobank and CPRD Gold.

Early diagnosis of cancer relies on accurate assessment of cancer risk in patients presenting with symptoms, when screening is not appropriate. But recorded symptoms in cancer patients pre-diagnosis may vary between different sources of electronic health records (EHRs), either genuinely or due to differential completeness of symptom recording. To assess possible differences, we analysed primary care EHRs in the year pre-diagnosis of cancer in UK Biobank and Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) populations linked to cancer registry data. We developed harmonised phenotypes in Read v2 and CTV3 coding systems for 21 symptoms and eight blood tests relevant to cancer diagnosis. Among 22,601 CPRD and 11,594 UK Biobank cancer patients, 54% and 36%, respectively, had at least one consultation for possible cancer symptoms recorded in the year before their diagnosis. Adjusted comparisons between datasets were made using multivariable Poisson models, comparing rates of symptoms/tests in CPRD against expected rates if cancer site-age-sex-deprivation associations were the same as in UK Biobank. UK Biobank cancer patients compared with those in CPRD had lower rates of consultation for possible cancer symptoms [RR: 0.61 (0.59-0.63)], and lower rates for any primary care consultation [RR: 0.86 (95%CI 0.85-0.87)]. Differences were larger for 'non-alarm' symptoms [RR: 0.54 (0.52-0.56)], and smaller for 'alarm' symptoms [RR: 0.80 (0.76-0.84)] and blood tests [RR: 0.93 (0.90-0.95)]. In the CPRD cohort, approximately representative of the UK population, half of cancer patients had recorded symptoms in the year before diagnosis. The frequency of non-specific presenting symptoms recorded in the year pre-diagnosis of cancer was substantially lower among UK Biobank participants. The degree to which results based on highly selected biobank cohorts are generalisable needs to be examined in disease-specific contexts.